Every owner has an opinion on this, usually formed by one arrangement that went badly.
The question that decides it
How much of the result does this person actually control?
A salesperson controls a great deal of whether a deal closes. An accounts assistant controls almost none of the month's revenue. Paying them the same way makes no sense.
Where fixed salary is right
Work where quality and reliability matter more than volume, and where the person cannot influence the number anyway. Accounts, admin, support, delivery roles.
Adding an incentive here usually distorts behaviour without improving output, because the person cannot move the metric honestly.
Where incentive works
Sales and collections, where effort visibly changes the result and the result is measurable without argument.
Even then, a base plus incentive beats pure incentive in almost every small business. People with no floor make short-term decisions, and short-term decisions in sales usually mean discounting and over-promising.
What makes an incentive fail
- Too complicated. If somebody cannot calculate their own number, it does not motivate anybody.
- Paid too late. A quarterly payout is barely connected to the work that earned it.
- Measuring the wrong thing. Incentive on sales made rather than money collected produces sales to people who do not pay.
- Changed midway. Once, and nobody will trust the next scheme either.
The one rule worth keeping
Pay it on time and pay it exactly as stated, even in a month where it hurts. An incentive paid late or trimmed is worse than no incentive, because you have taught the team that the number is negotiable.
Leave a Comment